Wishing on a Star

blog archive
Author

Tom Slee

Published

August 1, 2015

Note

This page has been migrated from an earlier version of this site. Links and images may be broken.

            The idea continues to float around that reputation systems provide a high-tech, lightweight and bias-free alternative to heavy-handed government regulation, but the truth is more prosaic: reputation systems are the new human resource departments. Really cranky, erratic, and unaccountable human resource departments.

Danny Vinik’s essay in Politico, Uber vs Laws is a good example of the reputation as regulation perspective (Mr. Vinik was kind enough to talk to Yours Truly for the piece, and I was less than articulate, so this is an attack of esprit d’escalier). Here is Danny Vinik:

Government regulations: The sharing economy, many observers hope, could start wiping them out. As sharing companies build powerful, influential customer-rating systems — think of Uber driver ratings, or Yelp stars —the thinking is that the market itself will increasingly police bad actors and frauds, weeding them out without the need for onerous rules.

There is a simple reason that reputation systems can’t replace consumer protection regulation, and it is too often passed over in the middle of discussions: they don’t even try to tackle the same problems.

Consumer protection regulations put quality control on things that customers cannot easily see or assess.